Not peeling grapes…

Standard 3.2.1 of the The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards in Australia states “Surveillance systems for healthcare associated infections are in place”.

If I could wave the magic wand, the standard I woulrainbow-star-magic-wand-6834-pd like to see would say something like this, “Electronic surveillance systems for healthcare associated infections are in place in alignment with the national surveillance program” (it’s a big wand).

It’s a fact that very few healthcare facilities have dedicated HAI surveillance software, which means that for much of it, surveillance continues to be a manual, labour intensive activity. Not only is this burdensome, we also know it influences data quality. Why don’t we all use electronic surveillance software (ESS)? Capital expenditure aside, maybe its because ICPs (and others) aren’t convinced of their value i.e. what effect does it have on day to day practice, how does it influence the overall infection prevention program?

In a recent systematic review published in the Journal of Hospital Infection, we sought to establish the impact of ESS on infection prevention. We were able to identify 16 papers in a search from 2006 to 2016. The review can be accessed here

DSC_0038-625x415

There was much variation in the studies, so it was difficult make any strong conclusions. However, we did find that every paper described a marked reduction in time taken to collect data and ascertain cases. This is clearly a good thing for the ICP collecting data, but I don’t suspect that saved time is spent sitting around peeling grapes. Its possible that the ESS allowed them to broaden their surveillance activities, provide more accurate and better quality data, respond to outbreaks quicker, undertake local research projects,  enable more detailed reports for the clinicians (and less detailed dashboards for their Executives), not to mention standardise data for public reporting and informing the build of algorithms for greater efficiency.

Unfortunately we cant really be sure how an ESS influences (benefits) infection prevention because we don’t have the data. As we conclude in our paper, we need specific research exploring the effect of ESS on infection prevention as a primary outcome, and whether this has any impact on infection and /or patient outcomes.

It would be very interesting to know if any hospitals with ESS have explored this issue, or if those who are moving towards implementing an ESS have considered some metrics around the benefits.

– Phil

3 thoughts on “Not peeling grapes…

  1. Michelle bibby

    Interesting thoughts Phil and yes a very big wand!
    I am inclined to think that if HSOs invested more time into the ICP role the two might go hand in hand…10 hours a week in a 150 bed facility leaves no time for anything, not even an ESS would help. This is where we need to be pushing for legislation just like patient rations, for ICP rations to be legislated per bed number. Suppose we just keep peeling those grapes and drinking that wine.
    Michelle

    Like

    Reply
    1. PLR Post author

      Agree Michelle. We need better data on ICP ratios (though the thought of ICP ‘rations’ also appealing!) and ICP competencies required to implement and maintain an IC program with the best outcomes…what makes a good IC program?

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s